![]() |
|||||
|
|
Projects to Help Lake Kenosia The
Lake Kenosia Buffer Gardens Project Objective 1: Filter storm-water runoff
The purple lines are possible runoff paths from higher areas to the lake. When it rains, storm water flows downhill through defined pathways (that may change) discharging towards Lake Kenosia. Without the buffer gardens, this runoff picks up nutrients and pollutants as it flows toward the lake, and creates erosion channels on the beach.
With the buffer gardens, the planted areas intercept the runoff, trapping sediments and absorbing nutrients and pollutants that would have discharged into the lake. It acts like a sponge, purifying the storm water and keeping the lake clean.
Objective 2: Deter Canada Geese away from the Beach
Canada Geese like an easy, unobstructed march from the grass to the water through the beach. Encircling their pathway from the grass to the lake with the buffer gardens stops the geese. The geese instinctively know that brush habitat, like the buffer gardens, may be home to predators such as coyotes and foxes so they will fly away seeking safer feeding grounds.
Objective 3: Habitat & Scenic Landscape
The buffer gardens also provide a scenic dimension to the simple landscape of the beach. The tubular flowers in the gardens will attract butterflies and ruby throated hummingbirds, and many other native species of birds. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Managing Weeds & Algae Every year, tall water plants grow from the bottom of the lake, creating an entangling nuisance. Until 2003, the City applied the herbicide Sonar, approved by the DEP, to control these weeds. After 2003, the State Health Department then banned the use of herbicides in Lake Kenosia because the lake was being used as a water supply in droughts.
Since then, annual monitoring surveys have shown increases in the growth of the nuisance weeds such as Eurasian watermilfoil and coontail. The Lake Kenosia Commission is exploring alternatives to herbicides to control the weeds. The Commission investigated and rejected the possibility of introducing weed-eating fish, which could not be adequately contained within the lake. Instead the Commission has employed scuba divers to suction the weeds from the bottom of the lake. See the section on State of the Lake.
Promising
non-chemical weed management alternatives
|
|||||